Pass-through entities, especially
partnerships, frequently invest in real estate as a strategic financial move.
These entities utilize real estate investments to leverage tax advantages,
generate income, and diversify their portfolios. By holding property, they can
benefit from appreciation, rental income, and potential tax deductions, making
real estate a valuable asset in their investment strategies.
As the property's value appreciates,
refinancing to access the equity can become an attractive option. When a
business borrows funds and distributes those funds to its members, this may
result in a debt-financed distribution.
There are two methods for allocating the debt
proceeds and related interest: general interest allocation and optional
allocation. Under the general interest allocation method, the debt proceeds and
related interest are allocated based on how each member uses the proceeds.
Consequently, the deductibility of the interest expense varies and can be
treated in one of four ways.
1. Personal: the interest
expense would not be deductible. For example, James uses the distribution to
pay for a water heater for his primary residence.
2. Investment: the interest
is deductible but limited to net investment income. For instance, Jack uses
the distribution to purchase stock in a publicly traded company.
3. Passive: the interest is
deductible to the extent of passive activity rules. For example, Julia uses the
distribution to purchases an interest in a limited partnership.
4. Active: the interest
expense is deductible. For instance, Jennifer uses
the distribution to purchase tools for her sole proprietorship.
The interest expense related to the distributed funds will be
separately stated on the member's Schedule K-1. Consequently, depending on how
the distributed funds are used, as mentioned above, the interest expense will
be reported on their individual income tax return.
On
the other hand, the optional allocation rule allows a pass-through entity to
allocate the debt proceeds and related interest to expenditures made during the
same year, excluding distributions. As a result, if the expenditures exceed the
distributions, there may be no debt-financed distributions. Distributed debt
proceeds in excess of any expenditures will follow the general interest
allocation method. For instance, a business
refinances to a new loan of $2,000,000 and $500,000 is used to pay off the original
loan. The remaining $1,500,000 is distributed to its members. During the tax
year, the business also incurred $850,000 in expenditures and other debt has
not been allocated to these expenditures. As a result, the business chooses to
allocate $850,000 of the distributions to business expenses, following the
optional allocation rule. The business can deduct interest related to the
$850,000. The remaining interest expense related to the $650,000 would be
separately stated as debt-financed distributions, following the general
interest allocation method. The deductibility of the interest would depend on
how each member uses the proceeds.
It is important to understand the options for handling debt-financed distributions as there are pros and cons to the various methods. Please reach out to us if you would like to evaluate this as it relates to your real estate investments.